Peer Review for Authors

Author Toolkit Homepage
General Writing Tips
Peer Review for Authors
Publishing & Editorial Issues
Ethics for Authors
Other Resources

This section of the Author Toolkit provides guides to help authors understand the peer review process, deal with reviewer comments, revision and resubmission of papers.

How to prepare a paper and respond to referees’ critiques and recommendations
Chapter 9 from the Publishing Addiction Science: a Guide for the Perplexed e-book provides practical guidance about what journal editors are looking for in a journal article (e.g., originality, sound methodology, good writing), and what to do when the editor asks for a revision.

How to serve as an effective referee in the peer review process
Chapter 10 from the Publishing Addiction Science: a Guide for the Perplexed e-book, addresses the topic of peer review. The chapter provides a thorough description of the peer review process, what journal editors expect from reviewers, and how to prepare a critical but constructive review.

How to respond to reviewers
A thoughtful post on the Eco-Evo Evo-Eco blog, distilling the authors’ experiences in peer review down to a set of guidelines that can help optimize revisions and responses to reviewers, to maximize your chances of acceptance and minimize the number of rounds of review.

Writing a response to reviewer comments
More useful guidance on responding to a request for revisions, from the Dynamic Ecology blog.

The dumbest thing I ever said to a reviewer
A cautionary anecdote from the Scientist Sees Squirrel blog, reinforces some sound advice on ways to respond to review requests.

EASE Peer Reviewer Toolkit
A selection of resources compiled by the EASE Peer Review Committee.