-
B – A medical journal’s influence evaluation26 May 2011Sanni SA, Zainab AN. Evaluating the influence of a medical journal using Google Scholar. Learned Publishing 2011;24(2):145-154(doi: 10.1087/20110210) This study shows how a medical journal’s influence can be calculated by […]
-
B – Tools for management of plagiarism complaints25 May 2011Hagen B. Tools for the effective management of plagiarism complaints. PSP Bulletin 2010;9(4):8-10 IEEE (the world’s largest professional association dedicated to advancing technological innovation and excellence for the benefit of […]
-
B – Incorporating open access into libraries25 May 2011Cryer E, Collins M. Incorporating open access into libraries. Serials Review 2011, in press(doi: 10.1016/j.serrev.2011.03.002) Librarians can play a dynamic role in the development of the open access (OA) landscape […]
-
B – Evidence-based journalism25 May 2011Habibzadeh F, Yadollahie M. Evidence-based journalism. Croatian Medical Journal 2011;52(2):212-213(doi: 10.3325/cmj.2011.52.212) The principles of evidence-based practice can also be used in the field of journalism. An application of one of […]
-
B – Open access citation advantage: an annotated bibliography25 May 2011Wagner AB. Open access citation advantage: an annotated bibliography. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship; Winter 2010 The publication considers and weighs the evidence on the OA citation impact advantage. […]
-
B – Multiple open access availability and citation impact25 May 2011Xia J, Myers RL, Wilhoite SK. Multiple open access availability and citation impact. Journal of Information Science 2011;37:19-28(doi: 10.1177/0165551510389358) The study examines whether there is a direct correlation between multiple […]
-
B – Do OA biomedical journals benefit smaller countries?24 May 2011Turk N. Do open access biomedical journals benefit smaller countries? The Slovenian experience. Health Information and Libraries Journal 2011;28:143-147(doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2011.00932.x) The article considers whether open access (OA) publishing provides a […]
-
B – Open access and Scopus17 May 2011Miguel S, Chinchilla-Rodriguez Z, de Moya-Anegón. Open access and Scopus: a new approach to scientific visibility from the standpoint of access. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and […]
-
B – A randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing17 May 2011Davis PM. Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing. The FASEB Journal 2011; published online March 20, 2011(doi: 10.1096/fj.11-183988) Using a randomized controlled trial of […]
-
B – Statistical and scientific reviews of manuscripts17 May 2011Henly SJ, Bennett JA, Dougherty MC. Scientific and statistical reviews of manuscripts submitted to Nursing Research: comparison of completeness, quality, and usefulness. Nursing Outlook 2010 Jul-Aug;58(4):188-199(doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2010.04.004) The purpose of […]
-
B – Perceived value of scholarly articles17 May 2011Tenopir C, Allard S, Bates BJ et al. Perceived value of scholarly articles. Learned Publishing 2011;24(2):123-132(doi: 10.1087/20110207) Results from a questionnaire are presented: over 400 researchers in 12 countries responded […]
-
Imagination and interpretation: Writing science into fiction6 May 2011On 20 July 2011, Pat Barker CBE and Philip Sington will be leading a discussion at the Royal Society, London, about representing scientists and science in contemporary fiction. Both authors […]
