-
B – Peer review quality in nursing journals26 May 2011Shattell MM, Chinn P, Thomas SP et al. Authors’ and editors’ perspectives on peer review quality in three scholarly nursing journals. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 2010;42(1):58-65(doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01331.x) This study examined […]
-
B – A medical journal’s influence evaluation26 May 2011Sanni SA, Zainab AN. Evaluating the influence of a medical journal using Google Scholar. Learned Publishing 2011;24(2):145-154(doi: 10.1087/20110210) This study shows how a medical journal’s influence can be calculated by […]
-
B – Tools for management of plagiarism complaints25 May 2011Hagen B. Tools for the effective management of plagiarism complaints. PSP Bulletin 2010;9(4):8-10 IEEE (the world’s largest professional association dedicated to advancing technological innovation and excellence for the benefit of […]
-
B – Incorporating open access into libraries25 May 2011Cryer E, Collins M. Incorporating open access into libraries. Serials Review 2011, in press(doi: 10.1016/j.serrev.2011.03.002) Librarians can play a dynamic role in the development of the open access (OA) landscape […]
-
B – Evidence-based journalism25 May 2011Habibzadeh F, Yadollahie M. Evidence-based journalism. Croatian Medical Journal 2011;52(2):212-213(doi: 10.3325/cmj.2011.52.212) The principles of evidence-based practice can also be used in the field of journalism. An application of one of […]
-
B – Open access citation advantage: an annotated bibliography25 May 2011Wagner AB. Open access citation advantage: an annotated bibliography. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship; Winter 2010 The publication considers and weighs the evidence on the OA citation impact advantage. […]
-
B – Multiple open access availability and citation impact25 May 2011Xia J, Myers RL, Wilhoite SK. Multiple open access availability and citation impact. Journal of Information Science 2011;37:19-28(doi: 10.1177/0165551510389358) The study examines whether there is a direct correlation between multiple […]
-
B – Do OA biomedical journals benefit smaller countries?24 May 2011Turk N. Do open access biomedical journals benefit smaller countries? The Slovenian experience. Health Information and Libraries Journal 2011;28:143-147(doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2011.00932.x) The article considers whether open access (OA) publishing provides a […]
-
B – Open access and Scopus17 May 2011Miguel S, Chinchilla-Rodriguez Z, de Moya-Anegón. Open access and Scopus: a new approach to scientific visibility from the standpoint of access. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and […]
-
B – A randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing17 May 2011Davis PM. Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing. The FASEB Journal 2011; published online March 20, 2011(doi: 10.1096/fj.11-183988) Using a randomized controlled trial of […]
-
B – Statistical and scientific reviews of manuscripts17 May 2011Henly SJ, Bennett JA, Dougherty MC. Scientific and statistical reviews of manuscripts submitted to Nursing Research: comparison of completeness, quality, and usefulness. Nursing Outlook 2010 Jul-Aug;58(4):188-199(doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2010.04.004) The purpose of […]
-
B – Perceived value of scholarly articles17 May 2011Tenopir C, Allard S, Bates BJ et al. Perceived value of scholarly articles. Learned Publishing 2011;24(2):123-132(doi: 10.1087/20110207) Results from a questionnaire are presented: over 400 researchers in 12 countries responded […]
