Username
Password
EASE
- The official website of The European Association of Science Editors (EASE)
Menu
About Us
EASE Council 2025-2027
Annual General Meetings
EASE Committees, Chapters and SIGs
EASE Awards Scheme
EASE Global Forest
Sister Societies and Industry Partners
History of EASE
EASE Gallery
Honorary Life Members
Policies
Contact Us
Close
Membership
Membership services
Membership Directory
Register of Editorial Services
Register of Training Services
Job Advertisements
New to EASE?
Member benefits for each professional role
Membership Types and Rates
Apply for EASE Membership
Sponsored Members Scheme
Become an EASE supporter
Dell Technologies – EASE Partner
Close
Communities
Special Interest Committees
Environment and Sustainability Committee
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Committee
Gender Policy Committee and the SAGER Guidelines
Peer Review Committee
Professional Role Communities
Journal Editors
Manuscript Editors
Publishers
Peer Review
Authors/Researchers
Regional Chapters
EASE Azerbaijan
EASE Brazil
EASE Croatia
EASE Germany
EASE India
EASE Italy
EASE Korea
EASE Nordic
EASE North Macedonia
EASE Turkey
EASE Ukraine
EASE Vietnam
Translation initiative
Close
Publications
The EASE Journal: European Science Editing
The EASE Science Editors’ Handbook
The SAGER Guidelines
Guidelines for intersectional analysis in science and technology (GIST): Implementation and checklist development
SDG Checklist
Environmental sustainability and scientific publishing: a manifesto
Writing Your Research Paper: Tips From EASE Editors
Recommendations on the Use of AI in Scholarly Communication
EASE Quick-Check Table for Submissions
EASE Interactive Checklist for Submitting Authors
The EASE Form for Authors’ Contributions and Competing Interest Disclosure
EASE Ethics Checklist for Authors
EASE Standardised Retraction Form
EASE e-newsletter
EASE Updates
EASE Digest
EASE Statements
EASE Endorsements
Close
Resources
Shop
Events
Calendar of events
Training
2026 EASE Summer Symposium
Previous EASE Conferences
Close
Networking
EASE Communities
Previous EASE Conferences
EASE get-together
Close
Members
EASE
>
EASE Digest
Search / filter news
Clear filter
Article type
Articles & Editorials
Bookshelf
Digest articles
Event Previews & Reports
Latest EASE news
News
Article date
Select month
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Select year
2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
Keyword search
B- How to review journal manuscripts
10 September 2010
Rosenfeld RM. How to review journal manuscripts. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;142(4):472-86(doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2010.02.010) Reviewing manuscripts is central to editorial peer review. A common complaint of nearly all journal editors is the […]
B – Peer review should continue after publication
10 September 2010
Liesegang TJ. Peer review should continue after publication. American Journal of Ophtalmology 2010;149 (3):359-60(doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2009.11.015) Readers assume that articles published in peer-reviewed journals are scientifically valid, but there is sufficient evidence […]
B – Free journals grow
10 September 2010
Kaiser J. Free journals grow amid ongoing debate. Science 20 August 2010;329(5994):896-8(doi: 10.1126/science.329.5994.896) Today the so-called open access (OA) movement is claiming success with publishers producing hundreds of free-to-read, peer-reviewed […]
B – The Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)
10 September 2010
Craig ID. Introducing SNIP to the Journal of Sexual Medicine. J Sex Med 2010;7:2661-2(doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01907.x) The Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) is a new journal indicator that is based […]
B – Can we do better than existing author citation metrics?
10 September 2010
Finch A. Can we do better than existing author citation metrics? Bioessays 2010; 32:744-7(doi: 10.1002/bies.201000053) Trying to find a single accurate metric to properly measure author impact is quite impossible […]
N – UK science austerity on its way
9 September 2010
Researchers in the United Kingdom are anxiously waiting to see what damage may be inflicted on R&D funding by the government’s budget deficit. Levels of funding for the next few […]
N – Top tips for editorial professionals
9 September 2010
The UK’s Society for Editors and Proofreaders (SfEP) has compiled two sets of top tips from its membership, one from the point of view of freelance copy-editors and proofreaders and […]
N – US open access battle rumbles on
9 September 2010
The Association of American Publishers (AAP) has warned that US government mandates requiring free access to journal articles published by the private sector would seriously undermine scientific communication, as well […]
N – Making climate data free for all
9 September 2010
Meteorologists are meeting this week to hammer out a solution to one of the thorniest problems in climate science: how to make raw climate data freely available to all. The […]
N – Ghostwriting in the drug industry
9 September 2010
Journal articles on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) ghostwritten by medical writers employed by the pharmaceutical industry serially understated the treatment’s risks and promoted unapproved uses, according to an analysis of […]
N – JSTOR interface update
9 September 2010
On 21 August 2010 JSTOR released a new interface. One feature, the ability for any user to submit a search against all JSTOR content, drew strong reactions from many in […]
N – ENCePP Code of Conduct
9 September 2010
The European Network of Centres for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance (ENCePP) of the European Medicine Agency has developed a Code of Conduct for scientific independence and transparency in the conduct of […]
Page 113 of 164
« First
«
...
10
20
30
...
111
112
113
114
115
...
120
130
140
...
»
Last »