Username
Password
EASE
- The official website of The European Association of Science Editors (EASE)
Menu
About Us
EASE Council 2025-2027
Annual General Meetings
EASE Committees, Chapters and SIGs
EASE Awards Scheme
EASE Global Forest
Sister Societies and Industry Partners
History of EASE
EASE Gallery
Honorary Life Members
Policies
Contact Us
Close
Membership
Membership services
Membership Directory
Register of Editorial Services
Register of Training Services
Job Advertisements
New to EASE?
Member benefits for each professional role
Membership Types and Rates
Apply for EASE Membership
Sponsored Members Scheme
Become an EASE supporter
Dell Technologies – EASE Partner
Close
Communities
Special Interest Committees
Environment and Sustainability Committee
Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Committee
Gender Policy Committee and the SAGER Guidelines
Peer Review Committee
Professional Role Communities
Journal Editors
Manuscript Editors
Publishers
Peer Review
Authors/Researchers
Regional Chapters
EASE Azerbaijan
EASE Brazil
EASE Croatia
EASE Germany
EASE India
EASE Italy
EASE Korea
EASE Nordic
EASE North Macedonia
EASE Turkey
EASE Ukraine
EASE Vietnam
Translation initiative
Close
Publications
The EASE Journal: European Science Editing
The EASE Science Editors’ Handbook
The SAGER Guidelines
Guidelines for intersectional analysis in science and technology (GIST): Implementation and checklist development
SDG Checklist
Environmental sustainability and scientific publishing: a manifesto
Writing Your Research Paper: Tips From EASE Editors
Recommendations on the Use of AI in Scholarly Communication
EASE Quick-Check Table for Submissions
EASE Interactive Checklist for Submitting Authors
The EASE Form for Authors’ Contributions and Competing Interest Disclosure
EASE Ethics Checklist for Authors
EASE Standardised Retraction Form
EASE e-newsletter
EASE Updates
EASE Digest
EASE Statements
EASE Endorsements
Close
Resources
Shop
Events
Calendar of events
Training
2026 EASE Summer Symposium
Previous EASE Conferences
Close
Networking
EASE Communities
Previous EASE Conferences
EASE get-together
Close
Members
EASE
>
RESEARCH EVALUATION
Tag:
RESEARCH EVALUATION
B – Do pressures to publish increase scientists’ bias?
B – Promoting scientific standards
B – Putting gender on the agenda
B – Indicators for measuring researchers’ performance
B – Science fails to face the shortcomings of statistics
B – Challenging conventions on sample size
B – Researchers’ perception of citations
B – Effect of oncology trial registration on published findings
B – Do scientists really need a PhD?
B – High-information studies: highlighting the hypotheses
B – The introduction of the 5-year impact factor: does it benefit statistics journal?
B – Are you an honest scientist? Truthfulness in science should be an iron law, not a vague aspiration
Page 11 of 18
« First
«
...
9
10
11
12
13
...
»
Last »