The EASE Peer Review Committee have completed work on a new strand of our Peer Review Toolkit, to help journal editors and publishers assess the quality of peer review reports.
We are delighted to reveal EASE’s Four Considerations for Editors Regarding Peer Review Quality Assessment.
Any quality assessment process should begin with a thorough deliberation of what quality is and by providing detailed and clear guidance on quality to authors and reviewers.
Quality can relate to:
- individual peer review report – its tone, clarity, timeliness, thoroughness, constructive feedback, absence of bias, degree of manuscript improvement etc.,
- the overall quality of all reviewer reports or comments received for the same manuscript,
- or the review process itself – timeliness, diversity of reviewer background and expertise, transparency, etc.

