Username
Password
EASE
- The official website of The European Association of Science Editors (EASE)
Menu
About Us
About EASE
EASE Council 2023-2025
Annual General Meetings
EASE Awards 2022/23
EASE Awards
Close
EASE Virtual Forest
Sister Societies and Industry Partners
History of EASE
EASE Gallery
Honorary Life Members
Policies
Contact Us
Close
Membership
Membership services
Membership Directory
Register of Editorial Services
Register of Training Services
Job Advertisements
New to EASE?
Benefits of EASE Membership
Membership Types and Rates
Apply for EASE Membership
Sponsored Members Scheme
Become an EASE supporter
Dell Technologies – EASE Partner
Close
Communities
Special Interest Committees
Environment and Sustainability Committee
Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Committee
Gender Policy Committee and the SAGER Guidelines
Peer Review Committee
Regional Chapters
EASE Azerbaijan
EASE Brazil
EASE Croatia
EASE Germany
EASE India
EASE Italy
EASE Korea
EASE Nordic
EASE North Macedonia
EASE Romania
EASE Turkey
EASE Ukraine
EASE Vietnam
Close
Publications
The EASE Journal: European Science Editing
The EASE Science Editors’ Handbook
The SAGER Guidelines
EASE Environmental Manifesto 2021
Writing Your Research Paper: Tips From EASE Editors
EASE Quick-Check Table for Submissions
EASE Authors Contribution Form
EASE Ethics Checklist
EASE Standard Retraction Form
EASE e-newsletter
EASE Digest
EASE Statements
EASE Endorsements
Close
Resources
Shop
Events
Calendar of events
Training
18th EASE General Assembly and Conference
Previous EASE Conferences
EASE Get-togethers
Close
Networking
Forum
Members
EASE
>
Resources
>
Peer review processes and skills for authors and reviewers
Topic:
Peer review processes and skills for authors and reviewers
Panel discussion on the role of preprints and independent peer review services in crisis times
Webinar recording, Open access, open data and open science, Peer review processes and skills for authors and reviewers, Peer Review Committee, Special Interest Committees, Journal editors, Peer reviewers
Unlock ways to share data on peer review
Article, Open access, open data and open science, Peer review processes and skills for authors and reviewers, Peer Review Committee, Special Interest Committees, Peer reviewers
Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use – Vietnamese
Article, Gender, equity, inclusivity and diversity, Peer review management for editorial offices, Peer review processes and skills for authors and reviewers, EDI Committee, Gender Policy Committee, Peer Review Committee, Regional Chapters, Special Interest Committees, Vietnam, Journal editors, Peer reviewers
Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use – Turkish
Article, Gender, equity, inclusivity and diversity, Peer review management for editorial offices, Peer review processes and skills for authors and reviewers, EDI Committee, Gender Policy Committee, Peer Review Committee, Regional Chapters, Special Interest Committees, Turkey, Journal editors, Peer reviewers
What can we do to improve the peer review system? – A short survey of Food Technology and Biotechnology peer reviewers’ experience
Article, Peer review processes and skills for authors and reviewers, Croatia, Peer Review Committee, Regional Chapters, Special Interest Committees, Journal editors, Peer reviewers
Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use – Chinese
Guidelines, Gender, equity, inclusivity and diversity, Peer review management for editorial offices, Peer review processes and skills for authors and reviewers, EDI Committee, Gender Policy Committee, Peer Review Committee, Special Interest Committees, Journal editors, Peer reviewers
Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use – Korean
Article, Gender, equity, inclusivity and diversity, Peer review management for editorial offices, Peer review processes and skills for authors and reviewers, EDI Committee, Gender Policy Committee, Korea, Peer Review Committee, Special Interest Committees, Journal editors, Peer reviewers
Presentation: Sex and gender dimension in peer review: can you be SAGER?
Presentation slides, Conferences, events, and organisations, Gender, equity, inclusivity and diversity, Peer review processes and skills for authors and reviewers, Research design, methodologies and statistics, Gender Policy Committee, Peer Review Committee, Special Interest Committees, Peer reviewers
EASE Peer Review Card Exchange Game
Training Exercise, Peer review processes and skills for authors and reviewers, Peer Review Committee, Special Interest Committees, Journal editors, Peer reviewers
Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use – Spanish
Article, Gender, equity, inclusivity and diversity, Peer review management for editorial offices, Peer review processes and skills for authors and reviewers, EDI Committee, Gender Policy Committee, Peer Review Committee, Special Interest Committees, Journal editors, Peer reviewers
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review – version 3
Article, Editorial management, policies and standards, Peer review processes and skills for authors and reviewers, Peer Review Committee, Special Interest Committees, Peer reviewers
COPE What to consider when asked to peer review a manuscript – flowchart
Flowchart, Editorial management, policies and standards, Peer review processes and skills for authors and reviewers, Research integrity and publishing ethics, Peer Review Committee, Special Interest Committees, Peer reviewers
Page 6 of 7
« First
«
...
3
4
5
6
7
»