-
B – The ethics of scholarly peer review4 January 2012Souder L. The ethics of scholarly peer review: a review of the literature. Learned Publishing 2011;24(1):55-72(doi: 10.1087/20110109) This review attempts to track the various ethical issues that arise among key […]
-
B – Refereeing academic articles4 January 2012Hartley J. Refereeing academic articles in the information age. British Journal of Educational Technology Epub 28 August 2011(doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01211.x) In this article some of the current practices used by editors, […]
-
B – Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor4 January 2012Bornmann L, Marx W, Gasparyan AY et al. Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics. Rheumathology International ePub 23 December 2011(doi: 10.1007/s00296-011-2276-1) This article discusses […]
-
B – Publishers: Mobile Applications and Mobile Web Page4 January 2012Rodriguez TS. Publishers: Mobile Applications and Mobile Web Page. ETH Zuruch 2011. Unpublished paper on services developed by 63 major publishers to distribute content using web 2 technologies. In recent […]
-
B – Science editors’ associations20 December 2011Gasparyan AY. Familiarizing with science editors’ associations. Croatian Medical Journal 2011(doi: 10.3325/cmj.2011.52.735) The role of editors’ associations is evolving to solve the numerous problems of efficient writing, editing, and publishing. […]
-
B – Effect of using report guidelines during peer review on final manuscript quality16 December 2011Cobo E, Cortés J, Ribera IM et al. Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial. BMJ […]
-
B – Improving categorization of Scopus database journals14 December 2011Gómez-Núñez AJ, Vargas-Quesada B, de Moya-Anegón F et al. Improving SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR) subject classification through reference analysis. Scientometrics 2011;89:741-758(doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0485-8) This work introduces a proposal to […]
-
B – Correlation between peer assessments and h index values14 December 2011Bornmann L, Schier H, Marz W et al. Does the h index for assessing single publications really work? A case study on papers published in chemistry. Scientometrics 2011;89:835-843(doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0472-0) The […]
-
B – Research assessment: comparison of peer review and bibliometrics rankings14 December 2011Abramo G., D’Angelo CA, Di Costa F. National research assessment exercises: a comparison of peer review and bibliometrics rankings. Scientometrics 2011;89:929-941(doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0459-x) There is unanimous agreement that resources for science […]
-
B – Google’s vision for books14 December 2011Barron P. The library of the future: Google’s vision for books. Learned Publishing 2011:24:197-201(doi: 10.1087/20110307) Much of the world’s most useful information is locked within books and it is stored […]
-
B – Access to scientific publications: the scientist’s perspective6 December 2011Voronin Y, Myrzahmetov A, Bernstein A. Access to scientific publications: the scientist’s perspective. PLoS One 2011;6(11):e27868(doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027868) This study used the field of HIV vaccine research as a barometer to […]
-
B – Research ethics cases managed by COPE6 December 2011Foo JYA, Wilson SJ. An analysis on the research ethics cases managed by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) between 1997 and 2010. Science and Engineering Ethics 2011, 29 April […]