-
B – PrestigeRank: A new evaluation method for papers and journals15 March 2011PrestigeRank: A new evaluation method for papers and journalsSu Cheng, Pan YunTao, Zhen YanNing, Ma Zheng, Yuan JunPeng,Guo Hong, Yu ZhengLu, Ma CaiFeng,Wu YiShanJournal of Informetrics 5 (2011) 1–13doi:10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.011 The […]
-
B – Gender mainstreaming in editorial policies15 March 2011Heidari S, Eckert MJ, Kippax S. et al. Time for gender mainstreaming in editorial poliocies. Journal of International AIDS Society 2011;14:11doi:10.1186/1758-2652-14-11 Despite proven sex and gender differences, women continue to […]
-
B – Multiple open access availability and citation impact11 March 2011Xia J, Myers RL, Wilhoite SK. Multiple open access availability and citation impact. Journal of Information Science 2011;37:19-28(doi: 10.1177/0165551510389358) The research examines the relationship between open access (OA) availability of […]
-
B – Impact factors and editing of medical journals10 March 2011Gasparyan AY. Editorial. Thoughts on impact factors and editing of medical journals. Inflammation & Allergy – Drug Targets 2010;9(1):2-5 In our times editing of medical journals is gaining more importance […]
-
B – Open online review4 March 2011Mandavilli A. Trial by twitter. Nature 2011;469:286-287 The idea of open, online peer review is hardly new. In some fields scientists seem not willing to get involved in pre-publication discussion. […]
-
B – Unpublished results hide the decline effect4 March 2011Schooler J. Unpublished results hide the decline effect. Nature News 2011;470(437)(doi:10.1038/470437a) Many scientifically discovered effects published in the literature seem to diminish with time. Some scientists attribute the decline effect […]
-
B – Collaborator proximity as a predictor of scientific impact3 March 2011Lee K, Brownstein JS, Mills RG et al. Does collocation inform the impact of collaboration? PLoS ONE 2010;5(12):e14279(doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014279) This study investigated whether the physical proximity of collaborators was a strong […]
-
B – Are scientists good communicators?3 March 2011Radford T. Of course scientists can communicate. Nature 2011;469(445)(doi:10.1038/469445a) There are reasons why scientists, in particular, should be and often are good communicators. One is that most scientists work with […]
-
B – Public access to publicly funded research3 March 2011Giglia E. Public access to publicly funded research: how and why mandatory policies by funders? European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2010;46(4):603-607 In the latest years several funders and […]
-
B – Scientists prefer reading over publishing open access papers2 March 2011Vogel G. Quandary: scientists prefer reading over publishing ‘open access’ papers. ScienceInsider 14 January 2011 The EU-sponsored Study of Open Access Publishing (SOAP Project) surveyed 50,000 researchers for their opinions […]
-
B – OA Repositories: the researchers’ point of view2 March 2011Theodorou R. OA Repositories: the Researchers’ point of view. The Journal of Electronic Publishing December 2010;13(3)(doi: 10.3998/3336451.0013.304) A study examined how researchers consider and use open access (OA) publications. A […]
-
B – Publishers’ opinion about open access2 March 2011Fister B. The cash cow has left the room. What will it take for publishers to wake up to our reality? LibraryJournal Jan 13, 2011 This past yaer has seen […]
