Username
Password
EASE
- The official website of The European Association of Science Editors (EASE)
Menu
About Us
About EASE
EASE Council 2021-2023
Honorary Life Members
EASE Gallery
EASE Virtual Forest
Sister Societies and Industry Partners
Policies
Contact Us
Close
Membership
Membership services
Membership Directory
Register of Editorial Services
Register of Training Services
Job Advertisements
New to EASE?
Benefits of EASE Membership
Membership Types and Rates
Apply for EASE Membership
Sponsored Members Scheme
Membership Information
Close
Communities
Special Interest Committees
Environment and Sustainability Committee
Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Committee
Gender Policy Committee
Peer Review Committee
Regional Chapters
Brazilian Regional Chapter
Croatian Regional Chapter
Indian Regional Chapter
Italian Regional Chapter
Korean Regional Chapter
Mexican Regional Chapter
Romanian Regional Chapter
Russian Regional Chapter
Turkish Regional Chapter
Ukrainian Regional Chapter
Vietnamese Regional Chapter
Close
Publications
The EASE Journal: European Science Editing
The EASE Science Editors’ Handbook
The SAGER Guidelines
EASE Environmental Manifesto 2021
EASE Guidelines for Authors and Translators
EASE Quick-Check Table for Submissions
EASE Authors Contribution Form
EASE Ethics Checklist
EASE Standard Retraction Form
EASE Digest
EASE e-newsletter
EASE Statements
EASE Endorsements
Close
Resources
Events
Calendar of events
Member webinars
16th EASE Conference
EASE Get-togethers
Training
Past EASE Conferences
Close
Networking
Members
EASE
>
Peer review
>
Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals.
Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals.
23 August 2012