Username
Password
EASE
- The official website of The European Association of Science Editors (EASE)
Menu
About Us
About EASE
EASE Council 2023-2025
Annual General Meetings
EASE Awards 2022/23
EASE Awards
Close
EASE Virtual Forest
Sister Societies and Industry Partners
History of EASE
EASE Gallery
Honorary Life Members
Policies
Contact Us
Close
Membership
Membership services
Membership Directory
Register of Editorial Services
Register of Training Services
Job Advertisements
New to EASE?
Benefits of EASE Membership
Membership Types and Rates
Apply for EASE Membership
Sponsored Members Scheme
Become an EASE supporter
Dell Technologies – EASE Partner
Close
Communities
Special Interest Committees
Environment and Sustainability Committee
Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Committee
Gender Policy Committee and the SAGER Guidelines
Peer Review Committee
Regional Chapters
EASE Azerbaijan
EASE Brazil
EASE Croatia
EASE Germany
EASE India
EASE Italy
EASE Korea
EASE Nordic
EASE Romania
EASE Turkey
EASE Ukraine
EASE Vietnam
Close
Publications
The EASE Journal: European Science Editing
The EASE Science Editors’ Handbook
The SAGER Guidelines
EASE Environmental Manifesto 2021
EASE Guidelines for Authors and Translators
EASE Quick-Check Table for Submissions
EASE Authors Contribution Form
EASE Ethics Checklist
EASE Standard Retraction Form
EASE e-newsletter
EASE Digest
EASE Statements
EASE Endorsements
Close
Resources
Shop
Events
Calendar of events
Training
18th EASE Conference
Previous EASE Conferences
EASE Get-togethers
Close
Networking
Forum
Members
EASE
>
Editing and publishing
>
The dynamics of critical voices over time: the case of the medical book review (1890-2010)
The dynamics of critical voices over time: the case of the medical book review (1890-2010)
Posted on: 20 December 2012
