Session 5: Peer Review

Friday 2 June 2023 – 2.30pm-4.00pm (Turkish time)

 

Session 5.1 Reducing prestige bias in peer review with voluntary anonymization

In this session, the chair set the scene on the current understanding of bias and quality in peer review and asked each presenter to provide their findings on the impact of transparency or lack thereof on bias and quality of reviewer comments.

Chair

Bahar Mehmani

Reviewer Experience Lead, ElsevierNetherlands

Dr. Bahar Mehmani is the Peer Review Innovation Lead at Elsevier. She leads Elsevier journals’ peer review strategy and the Validation and Value innovation track. Bahar is also the chair of Peer Review Workbench which allows performing research on Elsevier journals’ peer review metadata to researchers, and an advisory member of Peer Review Congress. She was the past chair of the EASE peer review committee and is currently serving as EASE vice president. She received her PhD in Theoretical Physics from the University of Amsterdam (UvA) in 2010. Before joining Elsevier, she was a postdoc researcher at Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light (MPL).

Bahar’s ORCID: 0000-0003-4038-4531

Bahar’s LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/mehmanib/

Bahar’s Mastodon: https://mstdn.social/@bahar

Read more

Speakers

Tony Ross-Hellauer

, Graz University of Technology and Know-Center GmbHAustria

Read more

Misha Teplitskiy

Assistant professor, University of MichiganUnited States

Read more

Alessio Bolognesi

Interim Head of Journal Development, eLife Sciences PublicationsUnited Kingdom

Read more

Session 5.2: The ethics of peer review: What can go wrong?

Chair

Mario Malički

Editor-in-chief, RIPR Journal, Stanford UniversityUnited States

Read more

Speakers

Catriona MacCallum

Director of Open Science , Hindawi Ltd

Read more

Daniel Stuckey

Senior Publishing Ethics Expert, Elsevier

Read more

Tom Hunter

Research Integrity Manager, Frontiers

Read more