Session 7 – Post-peer review manuscript assessment

Session 7.2

Sunday, 26 June 9.30am-10.45am (Valencia time)

Communicating reviewer and editorial comments to authors and making the final decision

  • Should editors edit reviewer comments?
  • How do you deal with inappropriate comments in reviews?
  • How do you convey that one review might be more influential than others?
  • Editorial points: what to ask for at this stage
  • Assessing revised manuscripts – have the authors responded satisfactorily?
  • How do you decide whether to send for re-review if necessary?
  • Making the final decision

Speaker

Duc Le

Senior Executive Editor, The Lancet, UKUnited Kingdom

Read more

This session in full

Session 7 – Post-peer review manuscript assessment
Chair: Delia Mihaila, MDPI
7.1   Evaluating peer review and making decisions – Dr George Calin, MD Anderson Cancer Center (more details)
7.2  Communicating reviewer and editorial comments to authors and making the final decision – Dr Duc Le, The Lancet, UK (more details)
7.3  How to deal with appeals during the peer review process – Dr Enric Sayas, MDPI (more details)