10 events found.
EASE events
Events
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
EASE Webinar: Getting It Written: Tips and Resources
This session offered tips on starting a writing task, keeping going, editing one’s own work before submission, and more.
-
EASE Get-Together: Communication Practices
Join your EASE friends and colleagues for an informal social get-together to discuss the ways we communicate with each other, this event was hosted by Christa Bedwin.
-
PRW2023 Breaking the mould: exploring the impact of peer review innovations on the future
Scholarly publishing is entering a new era of radical change. The rise of Open Access (OA), open science, big data, Natural Language Processing (NLP), and Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping the landscape like never before. EASE partnered with editage to bring you this webinar for Peer Review Week 2023. Three speakers explored the different trends, spoke about the different 'futures' that the community envisions and discussed what is needed to prepare for this future.
-
-
Indian Chapter webinar: Good scientific practice and research integrity: building trust in Science
The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC). It has a global readership and receives over 3,000 submissions a year under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research. In this webinar Manu Jain Goyal, Scientific Advisor at IJC shared her understanding and experience of research integrity at the IJC and discussed her role which is to ensure the integrity of research published in the journal.
-
EASE Get-together: What makes a good conference?
Help us shape our next EASE Conference
-
-
EASE Webinar: How should editorial performance be monitored, evaluated and incentivised?
This session will explore the tensions between publishers and editors with regards to monitoring, evaluating and incentivising editorial performance, debating questions such as; How should article volumes be decided? What parameters should editorial teams work within? How should publishers evaluate Editors-in-Chiefs, and how should EiCs monitor and incentivise their teams?
