EASE - The official website of The European Association of Science Editors (EASE)

Resources

The Peer Review Committee have selected a number of useful resources, from EASE and our industry partners, to support your learning in this topic.

Communicable E37: ‘Peer review is broken’ podcast
Elsevier Societies’ Update Webinar: Peer review – latest developments
EASE panel discussion: Assisting Peer Review with Technology and Large Language Models
Infographic ‘A Brief History of Peer Review’
KnowledgeWorks Global PRW 2023 Interviews
Resources from the FORCE11-COPE Research Data Publishing Ethics Working Group: flowcharts
The effectiveness of peer review in identifying issues leading to retractions
Preprint review: What, why and how to get involved
Guidelines on Inclusive Language and Images in Scholarly Communication
Infographic: Being a good peer reviewer: Dos and Don’ts
Infographic: How to select reviewers in 7 steps
Infographic: Completing your review in 10 steps
EASE/UKRIO panel discussion for PRW2022: How can peer review support research integrity?
EASE Webinar – Quick Guide to Peer Review, with Bahar Mehmani
Web of Science Academy
Wiley Reviewer Resources
Which Are the Tools Available for Scholars? A Review of Assisting Software for Authors during Peer Reviewing Process
Wiley – peer review training
Training package for The BMJ’s peer reviewers
Springer: How to Peer Review tutorial
CIHR sex and gender training modules
Researchers Q&A
ReImagine Review
Presentation: Key considerations for peer reviewers Sex and gender reporting
Peer review report template
PLOS Peer Review Center
Nature Masterclasses: Understanding Peer Review
Peer review training course, free and on demand from ACS Reviewer Lab
Peer review training for scientific researchers
Peer Review Week YouTube Channel
Peer reviewer template from Authorea
How to peer review, author tutorials
How to write a scienitific peer review: A guide to for the new reviewer
How to write a scientific paper for peer-reviewed journals
Health Systems Global: The peer review process – what happens when you send your manuscript to a journal
Good Publication Practice for Communicating Company-Sponsored Medical Research: GPP3 Guidelines
How to check if sex and gender are properly reported in a paper
Elsevier Author hub
Editage Insights
eLife ‘Writing the review’ guide
Elsevier Publishing Campus: Peer Review
Essay writing guide for students
Focus on peer review – online course
COPE flowcharts related to peer review
Certified Peer Reviewer Course
Career advice: how to peer review a paper
BMJ Author Hub
BioMed Central: Peer review – tips for junior reviewers
12 Steps to learning how to peer review (via Publons Academy)
Peer review: the nuts and bolts 2
Peer review and gender bias: A study on 145 scholarly journals
How to get your research published and then noticed
Free/low cost resources for graduate students (or anyone else)
STM Peer Review Taxonomy – Presentation of the first draft
A standard taxonomy for peer review, version 2.0
Panel discussion on the role of preprints and independent peer review services in crisis times
Unlock ways to share data on peer review
Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use – Vietnamese translation
Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use – Turkish translation
What can we do to improve the peer review system? – A short survey of Food Technology and Biotechnology peer reviewers’ experience
Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use – Chinese translation
Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use – Korean translation
Academic journals: Selection methods for public support in Russia
Guidelines for open peer review implementation
Concepts of plagiarism
3rd International Symposium of Scientific Journals of Trakya University: How to Become Successful Authors and Editors of Scientific Journals
3rd International Symposium of Scientific Journals of Trakya University: How to Become Successful Authors and Editors of Scientific Journals, session videos
Presentation: Sex and gender dimension in peer review: can you be SAGER?
EASE Peer Review Card Exchange Game
Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use – Spanish translation
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review – version 3
COPE Reviewer Guidelines
COPE What to consider when asked to peer review a manuscript – flowchart
Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use – Portuguese translation
How to evaluate a manuscript critically: 12 questions you should always ask yourself
Publishing Addiction Science: A guide for the perplexed
What makes a great peer reviewer? Tips from Nature Research editors
Students 4 Best Evidence Critical Appraisal: A checklist
Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use
How to get published: making a good first impression
Planning ahead: what to think about prior to submission
An introduction to peer review
Sex and gender training video
Beginner’s guide to peer review, 3 part series of blog posts, Part 3
Beginner’s guide to peer review, 3 part series of blog posts, Part 2
How to respond to reviewers
The dumbest thing I ever said to a reviewer
Writing a response to reviewer comments
Beginner’s guide to peer review, 3 part series of blog posts, Part 1
A guide to getting published in ecology and evolution
How to review
EASE Science Editors’ Handbook – Section 4 Peer review
Peer review: the nuts and bolts
The ‘REAPPRAISED’ checklist for evaluation of publication integrity